Loading...

In Response To Sunday Picketer - Hallo friend SMART KIDS, In the article you read this time with the title In Response To Sunday Picketer, we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article baby, Article care, Article education, Article recipes, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : In Response To Sunday Picketer
link : In Response To Sunday Picketer

In Response To Sunday Picketer

Sunday Picketer made the following comment, which can be found here:

Sunday PicketerFebruary 19, 2017 at 8:18 PM

Anonymous 11:40 AM, there are a lot of manamko on the picket line but we're not all manamko AND like the manamko I know what I'm picketing for and who I'm protesting against.
I'm picketing for Apuron to be permanently removed as Archbishop so sometimes I carry the APURON OUT sign. Sometimes I carry the DEFROCK APURON sign because I believe that he ruined the lives of many more young boys besides the 3 who have accused him and the 1 dead man whose story was shared by his mother and brother.
Diana pointed out that Mr. Sondia was on the radio with Patti Arroyo without his lawyer present. The difference between the June 2016 K57 interview and the one last week with Cardinal Burke is that in June there was no lawsuit pending. But as of November 2016 David Lujan officially became Mr. Sondia's lawyer when Mr. Sondia filed the lawsuit against Apuron. It's not a good idea for a layman like Mr. Sondia to face the representatives of the Church who are all ordained like Apuron without his lawyer. Let's face it. The priests and Cardinal Burke are more interested in protecting the Church from scandal than they are about Mr. Sondia.

BTW: From what I've been told and from what I've read from former members, if anyone is being used and deceived it's the members of the NCW who cannot make decisions without the permission of their higher-ups who tell them which job to take, who to date or marry, when and where to go on vacation, etc, etc, etc

This is my response:

Dear Sunday Picketer, 

First of all, David Lujan officially became Roland Sondia's lawyer when he publicly announced his accusation against Archbishop Apuron at a press conference with David Lujan standing right beside him.  See the photo below: 

You stated that there was no lawsuit pending.  However, there was an anticipation of a lawsuit.  Why?  Because on May 16, 2016 in response to the paid sex ads targeting the Archbishop, Archbishop Apuron came out and stated that he will bring a lawsuit against those who are defaming him. According to KUAM news:

Last Friday - on Friday the 13th - the Archdiocese of Agana announced plans to file a civil suit against those spreading lies about the church and Archbishop Anthony Apuron. 

There was already an anticipation of a lawsuit before any of the alleged victims came out.  In fact, Tim Rohr admitted through news media that he obtained a lawyer for the alleged victims due to this anticipation of a lawsuit that was announced by the Archdiocese on May 16th. Furthermore, KUAM news reported that David Lujan was officially Mr. Sondia's lawyer.  

However, even with the anticipation of a lawsuit that was made by Archbishop Apuron, Mr. Sondia was allowed to testify to the media without the presence of his lawyer.  He was also allowed to testify in the public hearing for a bill that would lift the statutes of limitation, and again without the presence of his lawyer.  

The only difference between the Patti Arroyo talk show and the Vatican investigators is that Patti Arroyo never swore Mr. Sondia in.  The Vatican investigators, on the other hand, would ask Mr. Sondia to swear to tell the truth before the Almighty God.  

Secondly, Roland Sondia is not the one on trial.  Archbishop Apuron is the one on trial.  The investigators were there to get depositions in order to determine what the truth is so that a just judgement of guilty or not guilty would be rendered onto Archbishop Apuron.  So, what does Roland Sondia and his lawyer have to fear when they were not the ones on trial?  The Pope will judge Archbishop Apuron fate after the documents are reviewed in the canonical trial; therefore, that was an opportunity for Mr. Sondia to finally tell his side of the story to the Vatican, and he refused.  Their refusal makes the case for Archbishop Apuron stronger and in his favor. 

Finally, you stated: "if anyone is being used and deceived it's the members of the NCW...."  Sunday Picketer, YOU were the one who was deceived into believing that there was no canonical trial.  The jungle led you to believe that the canonical trial did not exist.  Now, you know it exists.  YOU were deceived into believing that Archbishop Apuron was hiding out in the seminary that some of the Sunday picketers showed up at the doorsteps of the seminary demanding to speak to Apuron.  Now, you know that Archbishop Apuron was never on Guam.  

thus Article In Response To Sunday Picketer

that is all articles In Response To Sunday Picketer This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article In Response To Sunday Picketer with the link address https://onechildsmart.blogspot.com/2017/02/in-response-to-sunday-picketer.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: