Loading...
Title : Still Waiting for a Transgender Superman by Jonathan Glater -Education Law Prof Blog
link : Still Waiting for a Transgender Superman by Jonathan Glater -Education Law Prof Blog
Still Waiting for a Transgender Superman by Jonathan Glater -Education Law Prof Blog
Education Law Prof Blog:Still Waiting for a Transgender Superman by Jonathan Glater
Now that the Trump Administration has explicitly disavowed guidance to schools on treatment of transgender students, it is worthwhile to revisit exactly what lawyers for the Justice Department and the Education Department wrote way, way back, last May, in a now-distant era.
Last year’s guidance – which is accessible on the Web site of the Education Department – addressed the meaning of the nondiscrimination language contained in Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. §1681 et seq. The law states:
No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.
This kind of nondiscrimination language in other contexts, most notably employment, has been interpreted by courts as prohibiting differential treatment based on gender identity. (The law includes several exceptions for specific institutions and organizations, like the Boy Scouts.)
If the prohibition has this same meaning in education, then it bars schools, colleges and universities receiving federal money from treating transgender students and other students of the same gender identity differently. For example, to require a transgender student to use a locker room, rest room, or other school facility designated for use by students of a different gender identity would run afoul of Title IX.
Now, I mentioned that courts have found gender identity-based discrimination to constitute sex discrimination “in other contexts,” and that is because the cases cited by the two departments in the guidance did not involve Title IX – with one exception. As discussed in more detail earlier in another post, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument next month in Gloucester County School Board v. G.G., and that case is the exception.
Gloucester County does not directly or expressly raise the question of the meaning of the nondiscrimination language in Title IX, although the Court could resolve that issue for practical purposes. Rather, the Court ostensibly Education Law Prof Blog:
thus Article Still Waiting for a Transgender Superman by Jonathan Glater -Education Law Prof Blog
that is all articles Still Waiting for a Transgender Superman by Jonathan Glater -Education Law Prof Blog This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article Still Waiting for a Transgender Superman by Jonathan Glater -Education Law Prof Blog with the link address https://onechildsmart.blogspot.com/2017/02/still-waiting-for-transgender-superman.html
0 Response to "Still Waiting for a Transgender Superman by Jonathan Glater -Education Law Prof Blog"
Post a Comment