Loading...
Title : Jobs and the Future Workforce, Part Two
link : Jobs and the Future Workforce, Part Two
Jobs and the Future Workforce, Part Two
A comment from Ghost Mom from Part One of this series on jobs and the workforce:
So many formerly accepted rules of thumb are no longer valid.
- It's not a good idea to stay at the same company and work your way up.
- States no longer subsidize as much of the cost of college so students have to pay for way more of it themselves, which makes it an unwise gamble for many.
- Preschool costs more than college in Washington state (and many other states), but there are no 529 plans or college scholarship programs for parents to pay for preschool.
- The whole idea of employer-based health insurance (and "group" policies) no longer works with employees shifting from company to company to climb up the ladder instead of working their way up within one company.
- By 2021, 9.2 million Americans are predicted to work in gig economy jobs.
How are our new workers going to pay for health insurance and maternity leave and preschool and a mortgage and a vacation? So many countries assume their citizens want to get an education, pick up the skills for a career, have a relationship, establish a home and raise children. They set things up to make that possible.
In the U.S. we seem to pretend that none of these things are the case.Boom! She lays it out pretty darn well and it's exactly where I had planned to go with this thread (so thanks to yet another smart reader).
What is the gig economy (and what its cousin, zero-hour contracts)? From Wired:
The gig economy gets its name from each piece of work being akin to an individual 'gig' – although, such work can fall under multiple names. It has previously been called the "sharing economy" — mostly in reference to platforms such as Airbnb — and the "collaborative economy". However, at its core are app-based platforms that dole out work in bits and pieces — making deliveries, driving passengers or cleaning homes — leading some to prefer the term "platform economy".That last sentence? There's your both the danger and the lack of future job security for the next generation workforce. Just as in the past when business has mostly put staff last - both in safety issues and pay/diversity - then now, for workers who are not employees, there a new kind of job insecurity.
Gig-economy work and zero-hour contracts have similarities. Both treat workers as contractors and offer no guarantee of pay, but gig economy roles are normally paid per piece — such as a set rate to deliver a package or drive a fare to a location — while zero-hours contracts are paid hourly, but with no set minimum.
Both are the result of companies trying to cut or limit staffing costs, and can leave workers unsure how much they'll earn.
Holiday pay? Sick pay? Nope.
That's legally possible because gig workers aren't seen by the companies they work for as employees but contractors — though a court ruling against Uber disagreed with that claim last year.I liken this to buying a home versus renting. With buying, you are building equity, just as if you have a permanent job at a company, you are building work equity. With renting and with contracted work, you are working to live but probably with zero to little health insurance or other benefits and no job equity.
Here's a great overview article from the Bureau of Labor Statistics about the gig economy.
What are the pros to a gig economy for workers?
- If you just give kids "skills," they don't need college. It's too expensive anyway. (As if the sole reason for going to college is to gain job skills.)
- The companies in the gig economy say those jobs bring the flexibility to work whenever you like. (As if most people don't need to work in order to live.)
True Story was a case study in what two Stanford professors call “flash organizations” — ephemeral setups to execute a single, complex project in ways traditionally associated with corporations, nonprofit groups or governments.Upsides:
In principle, many companies would find it more cost-effective to increase staff members as needed than to maintain a permanent presence. The reason they do not, economists have long argued, is that the mechanics of hiring, training and monitoring workers separately for each project can be prohibitively expensive.
But Ms. Valentine, who studies management science, and Mr. Bernstein, a computer scientist, note that technology is sharply lowering these costs. “Computation, we think, has an opportunity to dramatically shift several costs in a way that traditional organizations haven’t realized,” Mr. Bernstein said. “It’s way easier to search for people, bargain and contract with them.”
Yet the flash model appears to have revolutionary potential. If nothing else, millions of middle-management jobs that fell by the wayside in recent decades might one day be reincarnated as freelance project-manager positions. “The bottleneck now is project managers,” Ms. Valentine said. “It’s a really tough position to fill.”And while traditional white-collar freelancing — and certainly its gig-economy equivalent on platforms like Amazon’s Mechanical Turk — can be isolating, being part of an organization tends to be emotionally satisfying.
Downsides:
Still, even while fostering flexibility, the model could easily compound insecurity. Temporary firms are not likely to provide health or retirement benefits. And even if high-skilled workers like project managers and web developers find they are well compensated on the open market, said Lawrence Katz, a Harvard economist, low-skilled workers tend to fare worse outside firms.“This could be a potent force among many in the future,” he said. “From a policy perspective, we have to figure out how to empower labor when contracts last a few minutes or a few weeks.”
Hmm, what empowers labor? Oh right, unions.
One key item for those in the gig economy - discipline. It will take a huge amount of discipline to keeping looking ahead to the next job, setting up a way to save for retirement as well as bank dollars in case of a downturn or health issue.
To lend swagger to this idea of a gig economy, here's an older article from VentureBeat, Why Google doesn’t care about college degrees, in 5 quotes
“My belief is not that one shouldn’t go to college,” said (Google's HR head Lazlo) Bock. It is that among 18- to 22-year-olds — or people returning to school years later — “most don’t put enough thought into why they’re going, and what they want to get out of it.” Of course, we want an informed citizenry, where everyone has a baseline of knowledge from which to build skills. That is a social good.
But, he added, don’t just go to college because you think it is the right thing to do and that any bachelor’s degree will suffice. “The first and most important thing is to be explicit and willful in making the decisions about what you want to get out of this investment in your education.” It’s a huge investment of time, effort and money and people should think “incredibly hard about what they’re getting in return.”
Are the liberal arts still important?
You need some people who are holistic thinkers and have liberal arts backgrounds and some who are deep functional experts. Building that balance is hard, but that’s where you end up building great societies, great organizations.”
But to the nitty-gritty:
That last line is fairly flip to me and lays the groundwork for the so-called personalized learning system - if you have a computer, you can learn anything.Many businesses “require” a college degree; at Google, the word “college” isn’t even its official guide to hiring. With the rise of self-paced college courses and vocational learning, plenty of driven people can teach themselves all of the necessary skills to work at the company.
What are the five quotes?
- You don’t need a college degree to be talented
- Demonstrate a skill, not an expertise
- Logic is learned, and stats are superimportant
- Prove grit
- If you go to college, focus on skills
Related to this issue, an article from the New York Times, Hotspot for Tech Outsourcing: the United States:
Nexient, a software outsourcing company, reflects the evolving geography of technology work. It holds daily video meetings with one of its clients, Bill.com, where team members stand up and say into the camera what they accomplished yesterday for Bill.com, and what they plan to do tomorrow. The difference is, they are phoning in from Michigan, not Mumbai.
Salaries have risen in places like South Asia, making outsourcing there less of a bargain. In addition, as brands pour energy and money into their websites and mobile apps, more of them are deciding that there is value in having developers in the same time zone, or at least on the same continent.
As a result, the growth of offshore software work is slowing, to nearly half the pace of recent years.
“Domestic sourcing is here to stay, and it’s going to grow rapidly,” said Helen Huntley, an analyst at the research firm Gartner.
thus Article Jobs and the Future Workforce, Part Two
that is all articles Jobs and the Future Workforce, Part Two This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article Jobs and the Future Workforce, Part Two with the link address https://onechildsmart.blogspot.com/2017/08/jobs-and-future-workforce-part-two.html
0 Response to "Jobs and the Future Workforce, Part Two"
Post a Comment