Loading...

New allegation surfaces against Archbishop Anthony Apuron - Hallo friend SMART KIDS, In the article you read this time with the title New allegation surfaces against Archbishop Anthony Apuron, we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article baby, Article care, Article education, Article recipes, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : New allegation surfaces against Archbishop Anthony Apuron
link : New allegation surfaces against Archbishop Anthony Apuron

New allegation surfaces against Archbishop Anthony Apuron

This post is in response to a question made by an anonymous poster.   According to his/her comment: 

AnonymousAugust 10, 2018 at 2:14 PMDiana, how would you know that this new allegation is related to JW's doing?

First of all, the document shown in the jungle was a document stamped "filed August 8, 2018 at 2:45 p.m." by the clerk court.  Nowhere in that document does it show that it was stamped "Received."  See Rohr's blog. 

The document was not stamped "received" until 3:30 p.m.  This is the document that KUAM showed in its news report.  As you can see, the document used in the news report and made public was stamped "received August 8, 2018 at 3:30 p.m." by the court. See the news report below: 




So, what does this mean?  It means that Tim Rohr obtained a document filed by D.M. BEFORE it was stamped "Received at 3:30 p.m." by the court.  Who gave him this document?  Would the court of Guam give him a document that was not yet stamped "received" by the court?  Surely, it would be against the ethics of a lawyer to give a document to someone who is not his client. Only his client should have that document.    

Nevertheless, it did not matter to Tim that the document he had was NOT stamped "Received at 3:30 p.m." by the courts.  He simply published it even before the news media did.  In fact, Tim published that post about 3:00 A.M.  Yes, he stayed up very late in the wee hours of the morning to publish his post.  A friend of mine emailed this screenshot below taken from Rohr's Facebook page.  Noticed the time he posted it.  He posted the new allegation against Archbishop Apuron on his Facebook on August 9th at 3:37 a.m. before any news media reported it.  

Therefore, it would not be surprising if Tim Rohr already knew the identity of D.M.  One may even question how did he obtain a copy of the filed lawsuit before it was even stamped "Received" by the court?  The fact that he knew the filing of a new allegation BEFORE it transpired makes it suspect. Tim may change his stories, but his character remains the same.  After all, he also knew that some accusers against Archbishop Apuron would say they confided in Father Jack.  He knew this information 9 months before they came out in public with their accusations.   See the story here.

thus Article New allegation surfaces against Archbishop Anthony Apuron

that is all articles New allegation surfaces against Archbishop Anthony Apuron This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article New allegation surfaces against Archbishop Anthony Apuron with the link address https://onechildsmart.blogspot.com/2018/08/new-allegation-surfaces-against.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: