Loading...
Title : What If Women Were Supportive vs. Adversarial
link : What If Women Were Supportive vs. Adversarial
What If Women Were Supportive vs. Adversarial
TJ Martinell of Cascadia fame had an interesting observation in his latest podcast about how what women would be like if they were supportive instead of adversarial as they are today. I've often said women have three choices, two of which are acceptable:Support
Silence
Nag/criticize/obstruct
You can figure out which two are acceptable.
However, there is a lot more to whether women choose to support men or fight them, whether they are in a relationship or not. Do women support men socially by voting what is in the best interests of society? Do women support men in simply letting them be and be men? Do women support men in the case they are dating or married to them? Or do they insist on being a thorn in their side nearly every step of the way? And if it's the latter, what sociological, psychological, economic and political ramifications are their when there's an effective civil war between the sexes.
When I get more time I'll delve into it, but it's sad that TJ had to ask the question "What if women were supportive?" Alas, I guess that's a question nearly every generation since the WWII generation had to ask themselves in that as far as I can remember, it's been an "Us vs. Them" relationship instead of a Batman and Robin dynamic duo kicking ass and taking names.
thus Article What If Women Were Supportive vs. Adversarial
that is all articles What If Women Were Supportive vs. Adversarial This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article What If Women Were Supportive vs. Adversarial with the link address https://onechildsmart.blogspot.com/2018/08/what-if-women-were-supportive-vs.html
0 Response to "What If Women Were Supportive vs. Adversarial"
Post a Comment