Loading...
Title : A Layman’s Guide to the Destroy Public Education Movement
link : A Layman’s Guide to the Destroy Public Education Movement
A Layman’s Guide to the Destroy Public Education Movement
A Layman’s Guide to the Destroy Public Education MovementA Layman’s Guide to the Destroy Public Education Movement
By Thomas Ultican / Tultican
The destroy public education (DPE) movement is the fruit of a relatively small group of billionaires. The movement is financed by several large non-profit organizations. Nearly all of the money spent is free of taxation. Without this spending, there would be no wide-spread public school privatization.
It is generally recognized that the big three foundations driving DPE activities are The Bill and Melinda Gate Foundation (Assets in 2016 = $41 billion), The Walton Family Foundation (Assets in 2016 = $3.8 billion), and The Eli and Edythe Broad Foundation(Assets in 2016 = $1.8 billion).
Last week, the Network for Public Education published “Hijacked by Billionaires: How the Super-Rich Buy Elections to Undermine Public Schools.” This interactive report lists the top ten billionaires spending to drive their DPE agenda with links to case studies for their spending.
A Short Explanation of the Label DPE
The modern education reform apostate, Diane Ravitch, was Assistant Secretary of Education under Lamar Alexander from1991-93. She was an academic who held many research positions including the Brown Chair in Education Studies at the Brookings Institution and served in multiple capacities in different federal education administrations. Like all of her closest allies, she believed in the power of accountability, incentives, and markets for reforming schools.
In 2010, Diane shocked her friends by publishing, The Death and Life of the Great American School System; How Testing and Choice Are Undermining Education. In chapter 1 she wrote,
“Where once I had been hopeful, even enthusiastic about the potential benefits of testing, accountability, choice, and markets, I now found myself experiencing profound doubts about these same ideas. I was trying to sort through the evidence about what was working and what was not. I was trying to understand why I was increasingly skeptical about these reforms, reforms that I had supported enthusiastically.”
“The short answer is that my views changed as I saw how these ideas were working out in reality. The long answer is what will follow in the rest of this book.” (Ravitch 2)
In the book, Ravitch wrote, “I call it the corporate reform movement not because everyone who supports it is interested in profit but because its ideas derive from business concepts about competition and targets, rewards and punishments, and ‘return on investment.’ (Ravitch 251)
As Ravitch’s “corporate education reform” became more organized and ruthless, the Scheurich team’s Destroy Public Education model became a better descriptor.
Ravitch labled modern education reform “corporate education reform” and the label stuck.
Last year, researchers from the University of Indiana Purdue University Indianapolis (UIPUI) led by professor Jim Scheurich, who coordinates the urban studies program there, perceived a pattern in the destruction of the public schools. That pattern became the “destroy public education” model. As Ravitch’s “corporate education reform” became more organized and ruthless, the Scheurich team’s DPE model became a better descriptor.Continue reading: A Layman’s Guide to the Destroy Public Education Movement
thus Article A Layman’s Guide to the Destroy Public Education Movement
that is all articles A Layman’s Guide to the Destroy Public Education Movement This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article A Layman’s Guide to the Destroy Public Education Movement with the link address https://onechildsmart.blogspot.com/2018/09/a-laymans-guide-to-destroy-public.html
0 Response to "A Layman’s Guide to the Destroy Public Education Movement"
Post a Comment