Loading...
Title : My Response
link : My Response
My Response
This post is in response to the following comment:AnonymousSeptember 22, 2018 at 11:39 AMI find that hard to believe that through all the court filings, lawyers and the mediation process that the church will sit back and pay every victim without checking the validity of the accusations. And please don't blame JW,CCOG or LFM. Blame the past Bishops who knew about the abuse and did not do nothing. To some people the church is their sanctuary, it is unfortunate that some of these abuses occurred in the church. With some Dioceses in the States and elsewhere being exposed on sex abuse, I think the Catholic faith as a whole is being examined under a microscope.I am not blaming JW, CCOG and LFM for the child sexual abuse of the past. The clergy members who sexually abused the kids and covered it up are certainly the ones responsible. JW, CCOG, and LFM had nothing to do with that.
On the other hand, JW, CCOG, and LFM are responsible for the endless lawsuits, the shutting down of the parishes and Catholic schools along with Catholic services, and the loss of all Church assets. Of course, the Church is going to pay every alleged victim without checking the validity of their accusations because they have already made its position very clear. According to Lawyers.com:
“Settlement” is just a term for formal resolution of a legal dispute without the matter being decided by a court judgment (jury verdict or judge's ruling). Usually that means the defendant offers a certain sum of money to the plaintiff in exchange for the plaintiff's signing a release of the defendant's liability in connection with the underlying incident or transaction. This can happen at any point in a civil lawsuit. It can even occur before the plaintiff files a lawsuit at all, if the parties can come together a reach a fair agreement soon after the dispute arises, and both sides are motivated to do so.The idea is to offer money to the accusers and in return they will drop their lawsuit against the Church. The reason the Archdiocese of Boston still receives sex abuse allegations even after 15 years is because the Church does not do any investigations and scammers are aware of this. See the story here. Even Tim Rohr was aware of that fact when he stated in his 2010 letter (the bold is mine):
This is not alarm-ism. This is not exaggeration. This is a pattern. Moral entrepreneurs like SNAP, under the guise of protecting children, attack a diocese with allegations knowing that, even if they are unfounded, the seriousness of the allegations will precipitate a "hanging before the trial."Tim Rohr opposed the lifting of the statutes of limitation because he felt that B.J. Cruz only introduced the laws in retaliation against the Catholic Church and Archbishop Apuron. According to Tim Rohr in his letter dated February 23, 2011:
However, there are a couple things that you should know about Bill 34. First, Bill 34 and its predecessor, Bill 334 in the last legislature, despite what Senator B.J. Cruz continues to publicly disclaim, IS AIMED at the Catholic Church in general and the Archbishop in particular.
Bill 34 is Senator Cruz's personal act of retaliation against the Archbishop for opposing Bill 185 which would have legalized same-sex unions.However, when it was Tim Rohr himself who retaliates against the Archbishop, it was okay for him to lift the statutes of limitation. It was not okay for B.J. Cruz to retaliate against Archbishop Apuron by lifting the statutes of limitation. But it was okay for Rohr to retaliate the Archbishop by lifting the statutes of limitation. The bill, lifting the statutes of limitation, was aimed at Archbishop Apuron just as Rohr admitted in his blog:
More SMH and LOL. The words "Catholic Church" NEVER appeared in the bill. Neither its author nor the legislature as a whole ever brought up the words "Catholic Church." Not even the victims who publicly testified in support of the bill used the words "Catholic Church" other than to say they still love and do not blame the Church.
No, the words which were brought up over and over again were not the words "Catholic Church!" but the two words and one initial which is what Eusebio is really upset about: ANTHONY S. APURON.The bill that JW, CCOG, and LFM introduced and worked for its passage was aimed at Archbishop Apuron. It was in retaliation against Archbishop Apuron just as Rohr admitted. Although their intention was aimed at only one man, no one can excuse them for not knowing about the endless lawsuits that would come after the bill was passed into law. Thus, JW, CCOG, and LFM are responsible for the endless lawsuits that will be coming in the years to come, the shutting down of any parishes and Catholic schools, and the loss of any Church assets in Guam. And once we start seeing the shutting down of our parishes and schools, they will be responsible for the victimization of the thousands of innocent Catholics who had to pay for these settlements.
thus Article My Response
that is all articles My Response This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article My Response with the link address https://onechildsmart.blogspot.com/2018/09/my-response.html
0 Response to "My Response"
Post a Comment