Loading...
Title : Opinion | What’s Really at Stake in the Los Angeles Teachers’ Strike - The New York Times
link : Opinion | What’s Really at Stake in the Los Angeles Teachers’ Strike - The New York Times
Opinion | What’s Really at Stake in the Los Angeles Teachers’ Strike - The New York Times
Opinion | What’s Really at Stake in the Los Angeles Teachers’ Strike - The New York TimesWhat’s Really at Stake in the Los Angeles Teachers’ Strike
Can California provide sufficient resources to support an effective public education system? Or will charter schools cripple it?
LOS ANGELES — For decades, public schools were part of California’s lure, key to the promise of opportunity. Forty years ago, with the lightning speed characteristic of the Golden State, all of that changed.
In the fall of 1978, after years of bitter battles to desegregate Los Angeles classrooms, 1,000 buses carried more than 40,000 students to new schools. Within six months, the nation’s second-largest school district lost 30,000 students, a good chunk of its white enrollment. The busing stopped; the divisions deepened.
Those racial fault lines had helped fuel the tax revolt that led to Proposition 13, the sweeping tax-cut measure that passed overwhelmingly in June 1978. The state lost more than a quarter of its total revenue. School districts’ ability to raise funds was crippled; their budgets shrank for the first time since the Depression. State government assumed control of allocating money to schools, which centralized decision-making in Sacramento.
Public education in California has never recovered, nowhere with more devastating impact than in Los Angeles, where a district now mostly low-income and Latino has failed generations of children most in need of help. The decades of frustration and impotence have boiled over in a strike with no clear endgame and huge long-term implications. The underlying question is: Can California ever have great public schools again?
The struggle in Los Angeles, a district so large it educates about 9 percent of all students in the state, will resonate around California. Oakland teachers are on the verge of a strike vote. Sacramento schools are on the verge of bankruptcy. The housing crisis has compounded teacher shortages. Los Angeles, like many districts, is losing students, and therefore dollars, even as it faces ballooning costs for underfunded pensions.
California still ranks low in average per-pupil spending, roughly half the amount spent in New York. California legislators have already filed bills proposing billions of dollars in additional aid, one of many competing pressures that face the new governor, Gavin Newsom, as he begins negotiations on his first state budget.
Unlike other states where teachers struck last year, California is firmly controlled by Democrats, for whom organized labor is a key ally. And the California teachers unions are among the most powerful lobbying force in Sacramento.
On paper, negotiations between the 31,000-member United Teachers of Los Angeles and the Los Angeles Unified School District center on traditional issues: salaries that have not kept pace, classes of more than 40 students, counselors and nurses with staggering caseloads. But the CONTINUE READING: Opinion | What’s Really at Stake in the Los Angeles Teachers’ Strike - The New York Times
thus Article Opinion | What’s Really at Stake in the Los Angeles Teachers’ Strike - The New York Times
that is all articles Opinion | What’s Really at Stake in the Los Angeles Teachers’ Strike - The New York Times This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article Opinion | What’s Really at Stake in the Los Angeles Teachers’ Strike - The New York Times with the link address https://onechildsmart.blogspot.com/2019/01/opinion-whats-really-at-stake-in-los.html
0 Response to "Opinion | What’s Really at Stake in the Los Angeles Teachers’ Strike - The New York Times"
Post a Comment