Loading...

CURMUDGUCATION: Can Personalized Learning Deliver - Hallo friend SMART KIDS, In the article you read this time with the title CURMUDGUCATION: Can Personalized Learning Deliver, we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article baby, Article care, Article education, Article recipes, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : CURMUDGUCATION: Can Personalized Learning Deliver
link : CURMUDGUCATION: Can Personalized Learning Deliver

CURMUDGUCATION: Can Personalized Learning Deliver

CURMUDGUCATION: Can Personalized Learning Deliver

Can Personalized Learning Deliver

A new report published by the National Education Policy Center looks at the current state of K-12 personalized learning and finds that there are many reasons for school districts to think twice about embracing this hot new trend. “Personalized Learning and the Digital Privatization of Curriculum and Teaching” was written by Faith Boninger, Alex Molnar and Christopher M. Saldana of the University of Colorado Boulder, and it lays out several areas of concern. As the model spreads—and concerns spread with it—this report provides a clear view of the objections to modern personalized learning.

A History Lesson 

Imagine a technology “which gives tests and scores—and teaches.”  Or a call for a revolution in which science and technology would “combine to modernize the grossly inefficient and clumsy procedures of conventional education” as well as saving teachers time by freeing them from administering and scoring tests. All of that comes from Sidney L. Pressey, the inventor of the first real teaching machine, patented in 1928. Neither personalized learning nor the problems that come with it are new. In fact, the idea of personalizing learning through some sort of mass customization is almost 100 years old; ironically, one of the common pitches for current techno-privatized education is as an antidote to classrooms that supposedly have not changed in 100 years. 

 B. F. Skinner emerged in the 1950s with an alternative approach to Pressey’s, but as the authors note, the two both claimed that their approach would provide students immediate feedback, allow them to work at their own pace, and provide them more personal attention from teachers. “Both Pressey and Skinner also assumed that a student’s ability to provide the required response to a question demonstrated competency/mastery—and therefore ‘learning.’”

Modern personalized learning has not left any of this behind. 

The Modern Version 

You would assume that personalized learning meant something like “a humane school and classroom CONTINUE READING: CURMUDGUCATION: Can Personalized Learning Deliver

thus Article CURMUDGUCATION: Can Personalized Learning Deliver

that is all articles CURMUDGUCATION: Can Personalized Learning Deliver This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article CURMUDGUCATION: Can Personalized Learning Deliver with the link address https://onechildsmart.blogspot.com/2019/05/curmudgucation-can-personalized.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: