Loading...
Title : NYC Public School Parents: How our loss in court today ironically provided evidence of how shallow de Blasio's education policies have been
link : NYC Public School Parents: How our loss in court today ironically provided evidence of how shallow de Blasio's education policies have been
NYC Public School Parents: How our loss in court today ironically provided evidence of how shallow de Blasio's education policies have been
NYC Public School Parents: How our loss in court today ironically provided evidence of how shallow de Blasio's education policies have beenHow our loss in court today ironically provided evidence of how shallow de Blasio's education policies have been
Today at the NY Supreme Court, a hearing was held on our lawsuit vs the redactions of 2015 City Hall decision memo which discussed and memorialized the decision of the Mayor and his top aides to reject several recommendations of the Blue Book working group on how to revamp the school capacity formula. In particular, the Mayor rejected the group's proposal to align the formula with smaller classes -- which would be important if he or any subsequent mayor decided to significantly reduce class size as de Blasio had in fact promised to do when he first ran for Mayor.
On April 10, 2016, I submitted a Freedom of Information request for the decision memo from the Mayor's office about their decision to accept or reject the thirteen recommendations of the Blue Book Working group . This working group, appointed by the Chancellor and co-chaired by Lorraine Grillo, the head of the School Construction Authority and then-CEC 2 President Shino Tanikawa, made several recommendions in December 2014, including that the DOE should align the school capacity formula to the smaller class sizes in their original Contract for Excellence class size reduction plan
The City sat on these recommendations for more than six months, and finally in July 2015, in the middle of summer, announced that they would accept seven of the 13 but reject six others, including what several members said was the most important one: the one related to the goal of reducing class size. There were several articles about this rejection, including in Chalkbeat and WNYC Schoolbook , DNAinfo, and on my blog here and here.
It took more than two years after I had FOILed it, but in August 2017 I finally received the decision memo - 8 pages long and almost completely redacted. See below. Interestingly, it was signed by all the Mayor's top staff except for the DOE Chancellor Farina or the President of the School Construction Authority Lorraine Grillo.
Because it was the middle of summer I missed the statute of limitations for an appeal, but at my request, fellow Kids PAC member Brooke Parker FOILed the memo as well. CONTINUE READING: NYC Public School Parents: How our loss in court today ironically provided evidence of how shallow de Blasio's education policies have been
thus Article NYC Public School Parents: How our loss in court today ironically provided evidence of how shallow de Blasio's education policies have been
that is all articles NYC Public School Parents: How our loss in court today ironically provided evidence of how shallow de Blasio's education policies have been This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article NYC Public School Parents: How our loss in court today ironically provided evidence of how shallow de Blasio's education policies have been with the link address https://onechildsmart.blogspot.com/2019/05/nyc-public-school-parents-how-our-loss.html
0 Response to "NYC Public School Parents: How our loss in court today ironically provided evidence of how shallow de Blasio's education policies have been"
Post a Comment