Loading...

Checklist: Media Coverage of the “Science of Reading” | radical eyes for equity

Loading...
Checklist: Media Coverage of the “Science of Reading” | radical eyes for equity - Hallo friend SMART KIDS, In the article you read this time with the title Checklist: Media Coverage of the “Science of Reading” | radical eyes for equity, we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article baby, Article care, Article education, Article recipes, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : Checklist: Media Coverage of the “Science of Reading” | radical eyes for equity
link : Checklist: Media Coverage of the “Science of Reading” | radical eyes for equity

see also


Checklist: Media Coverage of the “Science of Reading” | radical eyes for equity

Checklist: Media Coverage of the “Science of Reading” | radical eyes for equity

Checklist: Media Coverage of the “Science of Reading”

Several years ago while preparing the first edition (2013) of De-testing and De-grading Schools: Authentic Alternatives to Accountability and Standardization, I came to know Peter DeWitt as a highly praised principal who wrote in that volume about no testing week at his school.
His work and career have shifted since then, but I have remained in contact through his public writing. Coinciding with a mostly fruitless Twitter debate about how the media continues to misrepresent the challenges and realities of teaching reading, then, I was strongly drawn to DeWitt’s 3 Reasons I Do Not Engage In Twitter Debates.
Much of his examination of the paradox that is social media is extremely compelling to me; his three reasons, in fact, resonate powerfully: They’re rarely about common understanding, they make you look really crazy to onlookers, and he’s not good at them.
When I find myself crossing (foolishly) DeWitt’s pointed line, I try to justify the effort by this (mostly idealistic and probably misguided) justification: Making a nuanced and detailed case, even through the limitations of Twitter, will likely not persuade the Twitter thread members, but can provide a platform for learning to those observing the discussion.
However, I find DeWitt’s conclusions hold fast, and thus, offering here the details and the nuance has a better, although also limited, potential for changing the dialogue and reaching more understanding.
Instead of providing yet another discrediting of yet another media misrepresentation of the “science of reading” (see some of that work listed CONTINUE READING: Checklist: Media Coverage of the “Science of Reading” | radical eyes for equity



thus Article Checklist: Media Coverage of the “Science of Reading” | radical eyes for equity

that is all articles Checklist: Media Coverage of the “Science of Reading” | radical eyes for equity This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article Checklist: Media Coverage of the “Science of Reading” | radical eyes for equity with the link address https://onechildsmart.blogspot.com/2019/06/checklist-media-coverage-of-science-of.html

Subscribe to receive free email updates:

0 Response to "Checklist: Media Coverage of the “Science of Reading” | radical eyes for equity"

Post a Comment

Loading...