Loading...
Title : LA Unified’s spending plan should be rejected and rewritten, says advocates’ complaint | EdSource
link : LA Unified’s spending plan should be rejected and rewritten, says advocates’ complaint | EdSource
LA Unified’s spending plan should be rejected and rewritten, says advocates’ complaint | EdSource
LA Unified’s spending plan should be rejected and rewritten, says advocates’ complaint | EdSourceLA Unified’s spending plan should be rejected and rewritten, says advocates’ complaint
LCAP doesn’t fully document how $1.2 billion will help high-needs students
A public interest law firm that has bird-dogged Los Angeles Unified’s spending has filed a formal complaint demanding that the state’s largest school district redo its 2019-20 school accountability plan.
The complaint argues that the district wrote a vague and deficient Local Control and Accountability Plan — or LCAP – that fails to meet the state’s transparency requirements on how it will spend $1.2 billion in state funding dedicated to high-needs students. The district’s board of education approved the plan last month, although several board members acknowledged at the hearing that they found the LCAP and the budget to be confusing.
In what could eventually could become a lawsuit, Public Advocates, together with the Los Angeles law firm Covington & Burling, expedited their complaint by sending it directly to the California Department of Education instead of first filing it with the district and, if needed, with the Los Angeles County Office of Education.
Public Advocates wrote that going through the channels would be “futile” given the district’s unresponsiveness to past complaints and the county office’s “consistent rubber stamping” of previous LCAPs. Delays in ruling on the complaint would “irreparably” harm children relying on the funding to improve their education, the complaint said.
But Jeff Breshears, an administrator who oversees LCAP complaints for the state, rejected that argument as premature and forwarded the complaint to the district and the county office of education. The county office hadn’t completed its evaluation of the 2019-20 LCAP when the complaint was filed, Breshears’ letter noted. Breshears ordered the district to rule on the complaint within 60 days.
Spokespeople for both the district and the county office declined to comment on the complaint, saying it was under review.
State law requires that districts and charter schools, in consultation with parents and the community, write an LCAP every three years, with annual updates, to account for CONTINUE READING: LA Unified’s spending plan should be rejected and rewritten, says advocates’ complaint | EdSource
Big Education Ape: Growing Scandal at Sacramento School District: Additional Email Reveals More Deception - Sacramento City Teachers Association - https://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/2019/07/growing-scandal-at-sacramento-school.html
thus Article LA Unified’s spending plan should be rejected and rewritten, says advocates’ complaint | EdSource
that is all articles LA Unified’s spending plan should be rejected and rewritten, says advocates’ complaint | EdSource This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article LA Unified’s spending plan should be rejected and rewritten, says advocates’ complaint | EdSource with the link address https://onechildsmart.blogspot.com/2019/07/la-unifieds-spending-plan-should-be.html
0 Response to "LA Unified’s spending plan should be rejected and rewritten, says advocates’ complaint | EdSource"
Post a Comment