Loading...

The Politics of Art in a San Francisco High School (Bari Weiss) | Larry Cuban on School Reform and Classroom Practice

Loading...
The Politics of Art in a San Francisco High School (Bari Weiss) | Larry Cuban on School Reform and Classroom Practice - Hallo friend SMART KIDS, In the article you read this time with the title The Politics of Art in a San Francisco High School (Bari Weiss) | Larry Cuban on School Reform and Classroom Practice, we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article baby, Article care, Article education, Article recipes, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : The Politics of Art in a San Francisco High School (Bari Weiss) | Larry Cuban on School Reform and Classroom Practice
link : The Politics of Art in a San Francisco High School (Bari Weiss) | Larry Cuban on School Reform and Classroom Practice

see also


The Politics of Art in a San Francisco High School (Bari Weiss) | Larry Cuban on School Reform and Classroom Practice

The Politics of Art in a San Francisco High School (Bari Weiss) | Larry Cuban on School Reform and Classroom Practice

The Politics of Art in a San Francisco High School (Bari Weiss)


This op-ed column appeared in the New York Times June 28, 2019.
Bari Weiss (@bariweiss), a staff writer and editor for the Opinion section, is the author of the forthcoming “How to Fight Anti-Semitism.”
27Weiss-jumbo.jpg
More than $8,000. That was the amount John Ashcroft’s Justice Department spent on blue curtains to cover up the busty Spirit of Justice statue and her bare-chested male equivalent, the Majesty of Law, in the department’s Great Hall in 2002. The Victorian move against the Art Deco sculptures spurred a thousand lampoons. “A blue burqa for justice,” my colleague Maureen Dowd memorably called it. In The Harvard Crimson, a young Pete Buttigieg wrote, “It seems odd that an infant is supposed to feed on them, and a grown man is expected at some point to behold them, but for a period in between we feel the need to see to it that no child ever sees a breast.”

I wonder, then, what Mr. Buttigieg, now on the presidential campaign trail, would make of the San Francisco school board’s unanimous decision on Tuesday night to spend at least $600,000 of taxpayer money not just to shroud a historic work of art but to destroy it.
By now stories of progressive Puritanism (or perhaps the better word is Philistinism) are so commonplace — snowflakes seek safe space! — that it can feel tedious to track the details of the latest outrage. But this case is so absurd that it’s worth reviewing the specifics.
Victor Arnautoff, the Russian immigrant who made the paintings in question, was perhaps the most important muralist in the Bay Area during the Depression. Thanks to President Franklin Roosevelt’s Works Progress Administration, he had the opportunity to make some enduring public artworks. Among them is “City Life” in Coit Tower, in which the artist painted himself standing in front of a newspaper rack conspicuously missing the mainstream San Francisco Chronicle and packed with publications like The Daily Worker.
Arnautoff, who had assisted Diego Rivera in Mexico, was a committed Communist. “‘Art for art’s sake’ or art as perfume have never appealed to me,” he said in 1935. “The artist is a critic of society.”
This is why his freshly banned work, “Life of Washington,” does not show the clichéd image of our first president kneeling in prayer at Valley Forge. Instead, the 13-panel, 1,600-square-foot mural, which was painted in 1936 in the just-built George Washington High School, depicts his slaves picking cotton in the fields of Mount Vernon and a group of colonizers walking past the corpse of a Native American.
“At the time, high school history classes typically ignored the incongruity that Washington and others among the nation’s founders subscribed to the declaration that ‘all men are created equal’ and yet owned other human beings as chattel,” Robert W. Cherny writes in “Victor Arnautoff and the Politics of Art.”
In other words, Arnautoff’s purpose was to unsettle the viewer, to provoke young people into looking at American history from a different, darker perspective. Over the past months, art historians, New Deal scholars and even a group called the Congress of Russian Americans have tried to make exactly that point.
“This is a radical and critical work of art,” the school’s alumni association argued. “There are many New Deal murals depicting the founding of our country; very few even acknowledge slavery or the Native genocide. The Arnautoff murals should be preserved for their artistic, historical and educational value. Whitewashing them will simply result in another ‘whitewash’ of the full truth CONTINUE READING: The Politics of Art in a San Francisco High School (Bari Weiss) | Larry Cuban on School Reform and Classroom Practice



thus Article The Politics of Art in a San Francisco High School (Bari Weiss) | Larry Cuban on School Reform and Classroom Practice

that is all articles The Politics of Art in a San Francisco High School (Bari Weiss) | Larry Cuban on School Reform and Classroom Practice This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article The Politics of Art in a San Francisco High School (Bari Weiss) | Larry Cuban on School Reform and Classroom Practice with the link address https://onechildsmart.blogspot.com/2019/07/the-politics-of-art-in-san-francisco.html

Subscribe to receive free email updates:

0 Response to "The Politics of Art in a San Francisco High School (Bari Weiss) | Larry Cuban on School Reform and Classroom Practice"

Post a Comment

Loading...