Loading...

The unintended consequences of forcing schools to share the same building - The Washington Post - Hallo friend SMART KIDS, In the article you read this time with the title The unintended consequences of forcing schools to share the same building - The Washington Post, we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article baby, Article care, Article education, Article recipes, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : The unintended consequences of forcing schools to share the same building - The Washington Post
link : The unintended consequences of forcing schools to share the same building - The Washington Post

The unintended consequences of forcing schools to share the same building - The Washington Post

The unintended consequences of forcing schools to share the same building - The Washington Post

The unintended consequences of forcing schools to share the same building

A growing number of schools across the country share buildings and other facilities with other schools, a practice called “co-location.” Although on the surface it seems to make sense to give empty space in a public school building to, say, a charter school without a brick-and-mortar home, there are a variety of issues that make this a far more problematic “solution” than it seems.

In this post, academics Kathy Schultz, Wagma Mommandi and Melia Repko-Erwin of the University of Colorado at Boulder look at those unintended consequences, which affect teachers, students and entire communities.

Schultz is dean of the school of education at the University of Colorado at Boulder, and her new book is “Distrust and Educational Change.” Mommandi and Repko-Erwin are doctoral students at the school.

By Kathy Schultz, Wagma Mommandi and Melia Repko-Erwin

When teachers and students started the 2019-20 school year, most returned to their own school buildings — though many found themselves sharing their facilities with one or more schools. It’s a phenomenon known as “co-location,” and it has become an increasingly common practice, especially in urban school districts. But while the decision to co-locate schools may seem like an obvious solution when one school is in need of space and another has extra, the unintended consequences of this decision can lead to distrust between students, teachers and administrators.

An all-too common scenario occurs when district leaders decide to house two distinct schools within a single building because an existing school has extra space and a newly approved school is in need of space. Some link this seemingly paradoxical issue of having too much and too little space to the proliferation of school choice and changing urban demographics; for instance, in 2000, California voters approved Proposition 39, which stated that available or “unused” space in district school CONTINUE READING: The unintended consequences of forcing schools to share the same building - The Washington Post

Distrust and Educational Change: Overcoming Barriers to Just and Lasting Reform: Katherine Schultz: 9781682532973: Amazon.com: Books - https://www.amazon.com/Distrust-Educational-Change-Overcoming-Barriers/dp/1682532976

thus Article The unintended consequences of forcing schools to share the same building - The Washington Post

that is all articles The unintended consequences of forcing schools to share the same building - The Washington Post This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article The unintended consequences of forcing schools to share the same building - The Washington Post with the link address https://onechildsmart.blogspot.com/2019/10/the-unintended-consequences-of-forcing.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: