Loading...

CURMUDGUCATION: More Proof The Big Standardized Tests Mean Diddly-Squat

Loading...
CURMUDGUCATION: More Proof The Big Standardized Tests Mean Diddly-Squat - Hallo friend SMART KIDS, In the article you read this time with the title CURMUDGUCATION: More Proof The Big Standardized Tests Mean Diddly-Squat, we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article baby, Article care, Article education, Article recipes, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : CURMUDGUCATION: More Proof The Big Standardized Tests Mean Diddly-Squat
link : CURMUDGUCATION: More Proof The Big Standardized Tests Mean Diddly-Squat

see also


CURMUDGUCATION: More Proof The Big Standardized Tests Mean Diddly-Squat

CURMUDGUCATION: More Proof The Big Standardized Tests Mean Diddly-Squat

More Proof The Big Standardized Tests Mean Diddly-Squat


Chad Aldeman (Bellwether Education Partners) wants us to take heart. He's over at The 74 (Campbell Brown's House of Reform Advocacy) arguing that although reformsters are writing off the last ten years as a "lost decade" there was actually some good news-- while "educational achievement" (by which Aldeman actually means "standardized test scores") remained stagnant, college attainment has been on the rise.

Well, that's a puzzler. Adelman suggests that you might explain the incongruity by claiming that colleges and high schools just lowered their standards. But he thinks the attainment rates deserve attention.

One reason is that it’s much easier to gauge attainment than achievement. Measuring attainment is as simple as asking adults what their highest level of education is, whereas measuring achievement involves a complex process of defining what people at various ages should know and be able to do, developing a tool to measure those skills, sampling the given population and then translating the sample results into larger estimates.

Well, yes. That second thing, the measuring achievement is hard, so hard I would argue (as I have for forever) that we can't actually do it, but in the education disruptor's desire to have such a tool, we've just rushed a couple of bad proxies to market and continued to pretend that they measure what they don't.


We already know that the NAEP is not actually a "gold standard" for measuring educational achievement. And the PARCC, SBA, and all their sad CONTINUE READING: CURMUDGUCATION: More Proof The Big Standardized Tests Mean Diddly-Squat




thus Article CURMUDGUCATION: More Proof The Big Standardized Tests Mean Diddly-Squat

that is all articles CURMUDGUCATION: More Proof The Big Standardized Tests Mean Diddly-Squat This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article CURMUDGUCATION: More Proof The Big Standardized Tests Mean Diddly-Squat with the link address https://onechildsmart.blogspot.com/2020/01/curmudgucation-more-proof-big.html

Subscribe to receive free email updates:

0 Response to "CURMUDGUCATION: More Proof The Big Standardized Tests Mean Diddly-Squat"

Post a Comment

Loading...