Loading...
Title : Misreading the Main Idea about Reading – radical eyes for equity
link : Misreading the Main Idea about Reading – radical eyes for equity
Misreading the Main Idea about Reading – radical eyes for equity
Misreading the Main Idea about Reading – radical eyes for equityMisreading the Main Idea about Reading
About a decade ago, I accepted an invitation from the ACT to review a set of new test questions for their reading section. As a career-long anti-standardized test advocate, after talking with several colleagues, I accepted that an inside view of the process would help me better confront the problems with tests such as the ACT and the SAT.
The process included receiving the test section, taking the test myself (and taking notes), and then being flown to Iowa City to attend a workshop where we walked through each question to help the test designers revise and edit so this section could be added to the implementation of the test.
Some important take aways included discovering that the test designers were almost exclusively experts in test design (not reading or literacy) and confirming that “good test questions” were mostly about if the question creates “spread” (a range of correct and incorrect) in the data and not if the question is a valid assessment of reading ability (whatever that is).
This experience came to mind when I ran across this on Twitter: CONTINUE READING: Misreading the Main Idea about Reading – radical eyes for equity
thus Article Misreading the Main Idea about Reading – radical eyes for equity
that is all articles Misreading the Main Idea about Reading – radical eyes for equity This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article Misreading the Main Idea about Reading – radical eyes for equity with the link address https://onechildsmart.blogspot.com/2020/03/misreading-main-idea-about-reading.html
0 Response to "Misreading the Main Idea about Reading – radical eyes for equity"
Post a Comment