Loading...
Title : Sons of Guam Were Not Deserters
link : Sons of Guam Were Not Deserters
Sons of Guam Were Not Deserters
Junglewatch said some false things about the former Guam RMS and its local seminarians, which you can find here.First of all, the former Guam RMS was never a fake seminary. That's what the mob wanted people to believe. Anyone who had done their research on the former Guam RMS would have found that the seminary was approved and accredited by the Pontifical Lateran University of Rome.
Secondly, the seminarians from Samoa and American Samoa did not withdrew their seminarians because their bishops believed it was a fake seminary. Their bishops pulled them out from the Guam seminary because they did not want their seminarians embroiled in the continuous attacks by the mob of angry people. After all, the protesters invading the RMS seminary was a great concern for the bishops of Samoa and American Samoa (See story here).
And finally, the RMS seminarians did not desert Guam. They were rejected and exiled by the mob in Junglewatch Nation and by Archbishop Michael who was pressured by the mob. The only reason the Umatuna and the Archdiocese of Agana published the story on Darren Tomas and Preston Perez was because they were "sons of Guam". According to a former seminarian who has come forward:
AnonymousAugust 2, 2020 at 1:50 AM
Tim Rohr has deleted my post that contradicted this statement:
"Chancery give public media prominence to two individuals from Guam who deserted Guam to serve as priests elsewhere? They had a choice to go to a seminary in California and thereafter return to Guam to serve our people. Instead they chose to go to an NCW seminary and serve somewhere else."
First of all, let me introduce myself: I am one of the last 12 Seminarians from the former RM Seminary of Guam. We did not desert Guam --- Guam was our mission and home. In 2017m we were told to meet with the "Office of Vocations" director and liason to the NCW who would give us "options" on how to continue formation post-Redemptoris Mater.
The truth was: there were no options. They proposed to us a deal they couldn't shake on, saying it would cost too much money that they didn't have. To the theologians, they said the proposal was for those who were beginning the Seminary. To those in Philosophy, he said the opposite --- the proposal was meant for those finishing the Seminary.
They told both groups of seminarians the proposal was for the other --- when neither were offered anything at the table. This is the truth. It needs to be said. No more "one-sided" truth.
We did not desert Guam. The Church, under the INTENSE PRESSURE from CCOG and the Jungle, succumbed and kicked us out. We were not a fake seminary, as over 10 ordinations within the first 3 years have shown.
Again, my people of Guam, we did not abandon you. We were rejected and exiled with no option of remaining. Although, of course, those in charge will say an option was discussed....but it was all a puff of smoke.Archbishop Michael was under pressure by the mob (See the story here). Four seminarians from RMS Guam were local men. These Chamorro men wanted to become priests for Guam and met with Archbishop Michael according to an anonymous poster who posted on my blog on March 23, 2018. According to that anonymous poster :
AnonymousMarch 23, 2018 at 9:31 PM
CLARIFICATION: The four Chamorro Seminarians who graduated from the Yona Seminary were college students and because they were never ordained by AB Byrnes, they never officially belonged to the Archdiocese of Agana.
In fact, here is Byrnes' statement from an October 4, 2017 article in the Guam PDN: "Archbishop Michael Jude Byrnes announced on Wednesday the Redemptoris Mater Seminary, which is controlled by the Neocatechumenal Way, will close by the end of the year because its model of priest formation is not sustainable for an island like Guam." (https://ift.tt/2Jc3205)
The four Chamorro Seminarians met one on one with AB Byrnes and it was his decision not to ordain them under the Archdiocese of Agana because he felt the RMS was not the acceptable model of priest formation for Guam. Guam has lost these four Chamorro Seminarians to U.S. mainland Archdioceses during a time when Guam really needed younger priests to begin replacing some of the aging and sickly priests on Guam. Sad, Sad Decision by AB Byrnes.The four Chamorro seminarians were James Arriola, Darren Tomas, Preston Perez, and Gabriel Camacho. Three of them are now priests in the United States, and one is presently a deacon. These Chamorro men were not deserters. They were rejected and exiled by the Archdiocese of Agana under intense pressure from the mob of the Junglewatch Nation.
If there is anything to be learned, it is that one should never give in to mob rule. Just look at what happened in Democrat-run cities of the United States who gave in to the mob. The citizens and businesses in those cities are hurting. Violence have also increased in those cities. And in the end, the mob turned against the mayors of those cities by demanding their resignations and defacing their homes. As a result of giving in to the mob, Guam lost four sons of Guam, three of whom are priests and one a deacon, and Guam moved backwards into "borrowing" priests mainly from the Philippines. And in the end, the mob branded these Chamorro men as "deserters" and even criticized the Archdiocese for recognizing two "sons of Guam."
thus Article Sons of Guam Were Not Deserters
that is all articles Sons of Guam Were Not Deserters This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article Sons of Guam Were Not Deserters with the link address https://onechildsmart.blogspot.com/2020/08/sons-of-guam-were-not-deserters.html
0 Response to "Sons of Guam Were Not Deserters"
Post a Comment