Loading...

Report: The Failure of Policy Planning in California’s Charter School Facility Funding – In the Public Interest - Hallo friend SMART KIDS, In the article you read this time with the title Report: The Failure of Policy Planning in California’s Charter School Facility Funding – In the Public Interest, we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article baby, Article care, Article education, Article recipes, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : Report: The Failure of Policy Planning in California’s Charter School Facility Funding – In the Public Interest
link : Report: The Failure of Policy Planning in California’s Charter School Facility Funding – In the Public Interest

Report: The Failure of Policy Planning in California’s Charter School Facility Funding – In the Public Interest

Report: The Failure of Policy Planning in California’s Charter School Facility Funding – In the Public Interest:

Report: The Failure of Policy Planning in California’s Charter School Facility Funding

California has more charter schools than any other state in the nation, in large part because of generous public funding and subsidies to lease, build, or buy school buildings. But much of this public investment, hundreds of millions of dollars, has been misspent on schools that do not fulfill the intent of state charter school policy and undermine the financial viability of California’s public school districts.

In the report, Spending Blind: The Failure of Policy Planning in California’s Charter School Facility Funding, In the Public Interest reveals that a substantial portion of the more than $2.5 billion in tax dollars or taxpayer subsidized financing spent on California charter school facilities in the past 15 years has been misspent on: schools that underperformed nearby traditional public schools; schools built in districts that already had enough classroom space; schools that were found to have discriminatory enrollment policies; and in the worst cases, schools that engaged in unethical or corrupt practices.

                                                           

The report’s key findings include:

• Over the past 15 years, California charter schools have received more than $2.5 billion in tax dollars or taxpayer subsidized funds to lease, build, or buy school buildings.
• Nearly 450 charter schools have opened in places that already had enough classroom space for all students—and this overproduction of schools was made possible by generous public support, including $111 million in rent, lease, or mortgage payments picked up by taxpayers, $135 million in general obligation bonds, and $425 million in private investments subsidized with tax credits or tax exemptions.
• For three-quarters of California charter schools, the quality of education on offer—based on state and charter industry standards—is worse than that of a nearby traditional public school that serves a demographically similar population. Taxpayers have provided these schools with an estimated three-quarters of a billion dollars in direct funding and an additional $1.1 billion in taxpayer-subsidized financing.
• Even by the charter industry’s standards, the worst charter schools receive generous facility funding. The California Charter Schools Association identified 161 charter schools that ranked in the bottom 10% of schools serving comparable populations last year, but even these schools received more than $200 million in tax dollars and tax-subsidized funding.
• At least 30% of charter schools were both opened in places that had no need for additional seats and also failed to provide an education superior to that available in nearby public schools. This number is almost certainly underestimated, but even at this rate, Californians provided these schools combined facilities funding of more than $750 million, at a net cost to taxpayers of nearly $400 million.
• Public facilities funding has been disproportionately concentrated among the less than one-third of schools that are owned by Charter Management Organizations (CMOs) that operate chains of between three and 30 schools. An even more disproportionate share of funding has been taken by just four large CMO chains—Aspire, KIPP, Alliance, and Animo/Green Dot.
• Since 2009, the 253 schools found by the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California to maintain discriminatory enrollment policies have been awarded a collective $75 million under the SB740 program, $120 million in general obligation bonds, and $150 million in conduit bond financing.
• CMOs have used public tax dollars to buy private property. The Alliance College-Ready Public Schools network of charter schools, for instance, has benefited from more than $110 million in federal and state taxpayer support for its facilities, which are not owned by the public, but are part of a growing empire of privately owned Los Angeles-area real estate now worth in excess of $200 million.

We’d love to hear from you. Send us an email: info@inthepublicinterest.org.

If you’d like to know when we release information like this, please sign up for our mailing list.

Report: The Failure of Policy Planning in California’s Charter School Facility Funding – In the Public Interest:

thus Article Report: The Failure of Policy Planning in California’s Charter School Facility Funding – In the Public Interest

that is all articles Report: The Failure of Policy Planning in California’s Charter School Facility Funding – In the Public Interest This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article Report: The Failure of Policy Planning in California’s Charter School Facility Funding – In the Public Interest with the link address https://onechildsmart.blogspot.com/2017/04/report-failure-of-policy-planning-in.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: