Loading...
Title : Why the IRS’ Recent Dark Money Decision May Be Less… — ProPublica
link : Why the IRS’ Recent Dark Money Decision May Be Less… — ProPublica
Why the IRS’ Recent Dark Money Decision May Be Less… — ProPublica
Why the IRS’ Recent Dark Money Decision May Be Less… — ProPublicaWhy the IRS’ Recent Dark Money Decision May Be Less Dire Than It Seems
With the tax agency already “toothless” on political cases, how much difference does it make if it’s now “deaf and blind,” too?
Starting next year, the Internal Revenue Service will no longer collect the names of major donors to thousands of nonprofit organizations, from the National Rifle Association to the American Civil Liberties Union to the AARP. Democratic members of Congress and critics of money in politics blasted the move, announced last week by the Treasury Department, the IRS’ parent agency. The Democrats claim the new policy will expand the flow of so-called dark money — contributions from undisclosed donors used to fund election activities — in American politics. For their part, Republicans and conservative groups praised the decision as a much-needed step to avoid chilling the First Amendment rights of private citizens.
The Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United unleashed these groups, typically organized as 501(c)(4) nonprofits, to spend unlimited amounts of money on campaign ads. Their role in American politics has grown increasingly central. In theory, the new IRS policy could have a significant impact on the tax agency’s ability to detect improper contributions — and thereby curb illegal campaign spending.
But in practice, even critics acknowledge that the IRS very rarely audits nonprofits. In other words, the IRS will no longer receive information that it was seemingly making little use of. And the information in question was already shielded from the public’s view.
Up to now, IRS regulations have required all types of nonprofits to report the names and addresses of each major donor, as well as the dollar amount the donor contributed that year, on their tax returns. But the IRS can override this reporting requirement in certain cases when it finds that the information is “not necessary for the efficient administration of the internal revenue laws.”
That’s what the IRS did last week — relieving most nonprofits, excluding 501(c)(3) charities and foundations, of the need to report the names and addresses of major donors. “The IRS simply does not need tax returns with donor names and addresses to do its job in this area,” Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said in a press release.
The Treasury Department pointed to 2015 changes to the tax code that exempted from taxation many gifts or contributions to nonprofits. Without the need to Continue reading: Why the IRS’ Recent Dark Money Decision May Be Less… — ProPublica
thus Article Why the IRS’ Recent Dark Money Decision May Be Less… — ProPublica
that is all articles Why the IRS’ Recent Dark Money Decision May Be Less… — ProPublica This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article Why the IRS’ Recent Dark Money Decision May Be Less… — ProPublica with the link address https://onechildsmart.blogspot.com/2018/07/why-irs-recent-dark-money-decision-may.html
0 Response to "Why the IRS’ Recent Dark Money Decision May Be Less… — ProPublica"
Post a Comment