Loading...

NYC Educator: One Giant Step for Stupidity

Loading...
NYC Educator: One Giant Step for Stupidity - Hallo friend SMART KIDS, In the article you read this time with the title NYC Educator: One Giant Step for Stupidity, we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article baby, Article care, Article education, Article recipes, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : NYC Educator: One Giant Step for Stupidity
link : NYC Educator: One Giant Step for Stupidity

see also


NYC Educator: One Giant Step for Stupidity

NYC Educator: One Giant Step for Stupidity

One Giant Step for Stupidity



Yesterday I marked a student present who had not shown up to class all week. How does that happen? Lately it happens when the DOE puts out guidelines without consulting with the union. It turns out that people who sit in offices all day may have little knowledge of what goes on in classrooms. And yes, if school supervisors sit in offices all day that can apply to them as well.

We got a directive the other day that we must take attendance daily whether or not we hold class.I checked to make sure the source was DOE, and of course it was. That's understandable, of course, if you aren't holding virtual classes. If you're communicating via email or chat or something, the student doesn't have to actually show up to a class meeting. If you are holding class meetings, as I am, that's something else altogether. Nonetheless, those of us holding classes should send an email, a yes/no question, or whatever, and if the student responds, we are to mark that student present.

Now in case this isn't sufficiently absurd, consider this--you may not penalize anyone for not showing up to your virtual class. Therefore, the students who bother to show up and participate have no actual advantage over those who do not. In fact they may be at a disadvantage, as perhaps their performance could negatively impact their grade. Of course there may be circumstances under which a student may not participate. For example, your student may not have an internet-enabled device. That applies to exactly none of my students, as far as I know.

I have one student who I know suffers from depression, and has anxiety over everything that's going on. I understand that completely and I would never penalize this student. I'm not actually looking to penalize anyone anyway. Still, the notion of assessing students who are held harmless for doing nothing is tough to get my head around.

Assessments in the traditional sense are also absurd. I cannot force students to show their faces during live sessions. I had limited success yesterday when I offered  CONTINUE READING


thus Article NYC Educator: One Giant Step for Stupidity

that is all articles NYC Educator: One Giant Step for Stupidity This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article NYC Educator: One Giant Step for Stupidity with the link address https://onechildsmart.blogspot.com/2020/03/nyc-educator-one-giant-step-for.html

Subscribe to receive free email updates:

0 Response to "NYC Educator: One Giant Step for Stupidity"

Post a Comment

Loading...